Search for: "Bell v. Credit Collection Services, Inc. et al" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific  Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
In upholding the threat of job loss violation, the Board distinguished a Sixth Circuit case involving the same Respondent, DTR Industries, Inc., v. [read post]